Skip to main content
2026  •  Journal Article

High-Throughput Graphite Recovery from Battery Anode Scrap, Impacts of Using In-Line Near-Infrared Processing on Material Integrity

Graphite, the predominant anode material in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), accounts for a substantial share of both battery mass and cost. However, the recycling of graphite anodes remains energetically and technically challenging since residual binders and electrically conductive additives hinder effective material recovery and can degrade reusability and electrochemical performance. This work outlines a new thermal approach to regenerate graphite anodes based on near-infrared (NIR) irradiation, which enables rapid binder deactivation, and benchmarks its performance against conventional furnace heat treatment. Model graphite anode composites comprising graphite, carbon black, and representative aqueous binders (carboxymethyl cellulose and styrene–butadiene rubber) were prepared and subjected to a range of furnace and NIR exposure conditions. Our results demonstrate that furnace treatment at 450–470 °C for 60–120 min and NIR irradiation at 100% intensity for only 15.6 s at a line speed of 2 m/minute can effectively deactivate binders without compromising the graphite crystal structure. In terms of electrochemical performance, the NIR-regenerated graphite (G–N100) delivered an initial specific capacity of 354.1 mAh g–1 at 10 mA g–1 and retained 99.9% of its capacity after 20 cycles; this represents a specific capacity that is 99.4% of pristine graphite (356.0 mAh g–1) under the same conditions. In contrast, furnace-regenerated samples (G–470 and G–450) exhibited higher specific capacities of 374.7 and 373.7 mAh g–1 at 10 mA g–1, slightly exceeding that of pristine graphite. This work demonstrates that NIR irradiation can provide a selective, ultrafast thermal route to decompose binder additives while also preserving the graphite structure and electrochemical performance with greenhouse gas emissions of 0.4 kgCO2e/kg compared with between 1.4 and 9 kgCO2e/kg for virgin anode grade graphite.
Bibliographic Record
Cite This Work
10.1021/acssusresmgt.6c00237
External Links
PlumX
PlumX Metrics are a comprehensive set of "altmetrics" (alternative metrics) that track how research, such as articles and data sets, is used, discussed, and shared online. They provide insights beyond traditional citation counts by tracking interactions across five categories: Usage, Captures, Mentions, Social Media, and Citations.
Scite.AI
Scite.ai provides a visual, real-time summary of how a scholarly paper has been cited, moving beyond simple citation counts. It classifies citations using AI to show if a paper is supported, mentioned, or contrasted, alongside retraction alerts, as well as showing the most common sections of a paper in which the paper was cited.
Dimensions
Dimensions shows the academic impact of a specific research output by highlighting both traditional citation counts and normalized, context-aware metrics.

Field Citation Ratio (FCR): Compares the citation count to other similarly aged publications in the same field. An FCR greater than 1.0 indicates above-average citations.

Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A metric that compares an article’s citation performance to that of others in the same area.

Altmetrics
Altmetrics complement traditional metrics by highlighting broader, faster, and more varied types of engagement.

Altmetric "donuts," provide a summary of the online attention and engagement a research output has received. The colors indicate the types of sources.

The Altmetric Score is a weighted count of the attention a piece of research has received. It measures volume rather than quality, highlighting how much conversation is happening, not necessarily whether that conversation is positive or negative.
Edit