Skip to main content
2021  •  Journal Article

Risk management over the life cycle of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles

Lithium-ion Batteries (LIB) are an essential facilitator of the decarbonisation of the transport and energy system, and their high energy densities represent a major technological achievement and resource for humankind. In this research, it has been argued that LIBs have penetrated everyday life faster than our understanding of the risks and challenges associated with them. The current safety standards in the car industry have benefited from over 130 years of evolution and refinement, and Electric Vehicle (EV) and LIB are comparably in their infancy. This paper considers some of the issues of safety over the life cycle of batteries, including: the End of Life disposal of batteries, their potential reuse in a second-life application (e.g. in Battery Energy Storage Systems), recycling and unscheduled End of Life (i.e. accidents). The failure mechanism and reports from a range of global case studies, scenarios and incidents are described to infer potential safety issues and highlight lessons that can be learned. Therefore, the safety risks of LIBs were categorised, and the regularity requirements to create and inform a wider debate on the general safety of LIBs were discussed. From the analysis, a range of gaps in current approaches have been identified and the risk management systems was discussed. Ultimately, it is concluded that robust educational and legal processes are needed to understand and manage the risks for first responders and the public at large to ensure a safe and beneficial transition to low carbon transportation and energy system.
Bibliographic Record
Cite This Work

10.1016/j.rser.2021.111240
PlumX

PlumX Metrics are a comprehensive set of "altmetrics" (alternative metrics) that track how research, such as articles and data sets, is used, discussed, and shared online. They provide insights beyond traditional citation counts by tracking interactions across five categories: Usage, Captures, Mentions, Social Media, and Citations.
Scite.AI

Scite.ai provides a visual, real-time summary of how a scholarly paper has been cited, moving beyond simple citation counts. It classifies citations using AI to show if a paper is supported, mentioned, or contrasted, alongside retraction alerts, as well as showing the most common sections of a paper in which the paper was cited.

Dimensions

Dimensions shows the academic impact of a specific research output by highlighting both traditional citation counts and normalized, context-aware metrics.

Field Citation Ratio (FCR): Compares the citation count to other similarly aged publications in the same field. An FCR greater than 1.0 indicates above-average citations.

Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A metric that compares an article’s citation performance to that of others in the same area.


Altmetrics

Altmetrics complement traditional metrics by highlighting broader, faster, and more varied types of engagement.

Altmetric "donuts," provide a summary of the online attention and engagement a research output has received. The colors indicate the types of sources.

The Altmetric Score is a weighted count of the attention a piece of research has received. It measures volume rather than quality, highlighting how much conversation is happening, not necessarily whether that conversation is positive or negative.

Edit