Skip to main content
2026  •  Journal Article

Towards a courageous EU policy for recycling spent lithium-ion batteries: rethinking dismantling, standardization, and responsibility

The rapid expansion of electric mobility across Europe is generating, and is expected to generate, unprecedented volumes of end-of-life lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), exposing structural weaknesses in the European Union's regulatory and industrial framework for battery recycling. We have crossed the point at which electric vehicles, for the first time, have out-sold petrol vehicles in Europe. Recent EU initiatives, including the Batteries Regulation, introduce significant advances, including carbon footprint reporting, mandatory recycled content, digital battery passports, sustainability and circularity requirements, and stronger extended producer responsibility. The heterogeneity of battery designs is widely recognized as a key constraint affecting dismantling efficiency, automation feasibility, and material recovery outcomes. These design issues directly impede automation, depress material recovery yields, and undermine the EU's circular economy and industrial sovereignty objectives. Drawing on assertive industrial policies, this paper argues that the EU should adopt a bolder stance. It proposes the introduction of harmonised design-for-disassembly requirements for all batteries placed on the EU internal market, alongside a reform of Extended Producer Responsibility and waste classification to recognise spent batteries as strategic secondary raw materials. It also calls for the development of publicly supported robotised dismantling hubs. The paper argues that the main limitation of current EU battery policy lies not only in downstream recycling performance, but more fundamentally in the absence of binding upstream design requirements that determine whether dismantling, and therefore high-quality recycling, can be technically and economically achieved.
Bibliographic Record
  • Volume: 2
  • Issue: 5
  • Pages: 1459-1467
  • Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry
  • DOI: 10.1039/d6eb00060f
Cite This Work

10.1039/d6eb00060f
PlumX

PlumX Metrics are a comprehensive set of "altmetrics" (alternative metrics) that track how research, such as articles and data sets, is used, discussed, and shared online. They provide insights beyond traditional citation counts by tracking interactions across five categories: Usage, Captures, Mentions, Social Media, and Citations.
Scite.AI

Scite.ai provides a visual, real-time summary of how a scholarly paper has been cited, moving beyond simple citation counts. It classifies citations using AI to show if a paper is supported, mentioned, or contrasted, alongside retraction alerts, as well as showing the most common sections of a paper in which the paper was cited.

Dimensions

Dimensions shows the academic impact of a specific research output by highlighting both traditional citation counts and normalized, context-aware metrics.

Field Citation Ratio (FCR): Compares the citation count to other similarly aged publications in the same field. An FCR greater than 1.0 indicates above-average citations.

Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A metric that compares an article’s citation performance to that of others in the same area.


Altmetrics

Altmetrics complement traditional metrics by highlighting broader, faster, and more varied types of engagement.

Altmetric "donuts," provide a summary of the online attention and engagement a research output has received. The colors indicate the types of sources.

The Altmetric Score is a weighted count of the attention a piece of research has received. It measures volume rather than quality, highlighting how much conversation is happening, not necessarily whether that conversation is positive or negative.

Edit