Skip to main content
2026  •  Journal Article

A Hybrid Simulation Modelling Framework for Stress Testing Rare Earth Element-Centric Semiconductor Supply Chains

Semiconductor supply chains (SCs) depend on geographically concentrated rare earth element inputs and face systemic risks from geopolitical disruption, policy intervention, and capacity constraints across multiple decision-making layers. Existing stress testing approaches often quantify fulfilment loss without attributing it to strategic capacity shortages, tactical sourcing-access constraints, or operational congestion, even though each requires a different intervention. This study develops a hybrid simulation modelling framework integrating System Dynamics (SD), Agent-Based Modelling (ABM), and Discrete Event Simulation (DES) as necessary analytical approaches per decision-making layer: SD captures long-term capacity stocks and policy feedback (macro-level); ABM captures heterogeneous monthly sourcing and inventory decisions (meso-level); and DES captures stochastic weekly fabrication and shipment execution (micro-level). Applied to India's cerium-centric semiconductor SC through 247 experiments, 12,350 simulation runs and an additional 1,400 runs of sensitivity analysis, the results show that upstream cerium capacity disruptions are largely buffered, whereas loss of qualified fabrication capacity causes severe fulfilment collapse. Stable DES cycle times further confirm that this failure arises from sourcing access rather than operational congestion. This cross-layer diagnostic signal is only detectable when all three modelling layers are present. Managerially, the hybrid simulation modelling framework reframes stress testing as a multi-level tool that identifies not only whether an SC fails, but also where failure emerges and which interventions are appropriate.
Bibliographic Record
Cite This Work

10.1109/tem.2026.3731827
PlumX

PlumX Metrics are a comprehensive set of "altmetrics" (alternative metrics) that track how research, such as articles and data sets, is used, discussed, and shared online. They provide insights beyond traditional citation counts by tracking interactions across five categories: Usage, Captures, Mentions, Social Media, and Citations.
Scite.AI

Scite.ai provides a visual, real-time summary of how a scholarly paper has been cited, moving beyond simple citation counts. It classifies citations using AI to show if a paper is supported, mentioned, or contrasted, alongside retraction alerts, as well as showing the most common sections of a paper in which the paper was cited.

Dimensions

Dimensions shows the academic impact of a specific research output by highlighting both traditional citation counts and normalized, context-aware metrics.

Field Citation Ratio (FCR): Compares the citation count to other similarly aged publications in the same field. An FCR greater than 1.0 indicates above-average citations.

Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A metric that compares an article’s citation performance to that of others in the same area.


Altmetrics

Altmetrics complement traditional metrics by highlighting broader, faster, and more varied types of engagement.

Altmetric "donuts," provide a summary of the online attention and engagement a research output has received. The colors indicate the types of sources.

The Altmetric Score is a weighted count of the attention a piece of research has received. It measures volume rather than quality, highlighting how much conversation is happening, not necessarily whether that conversation is positive or negative.

Edit